Companies that employ repetitive manufacturing processes expect consistency. Businesses develop assembly lines for routine performance so they can focus time on other issues and trust operations to continue without direct supervision.
Sometimes, however, companies get thrown a curve ball and have to adapt. Changing government regulations or new technologies force businesses to overhaul operations to stay competitive and profitable. Other times, companies have to audit existing procedures because they miss out on opportunities provided by new solutions.
Whenever a company has to reevaluate manufacturing processes, it should employ mobile shop floor data collection software devices to capture current performance metrics and track the success of new solutions.
Recently, the U.S. Labor Department proposed new salary threshold rules. Manufacturing.net reported the Obama administration wants to make more workers eligible for overtime pay. Currently, only workers who earn $24,000 have to be paid overtime. The new rules aim to raise the threshold to around $50,000.
This means many companies would have to pay managers and other manufacturing officials for overtime activities. Many production supervisors would become eligible and projects will end up costing businesses a lot more. Manufacturing.net suggested companies should turn to software solutions to reevaluate processes and find ways to avoid the need for overtime altogether.
Manufactures need to find solutions for more efficient production lines. By employing tools that facilitate automated data collection and consistent performance, managers can create leaner production schedules that don't call for extra hours.
Outside of new government regulations, manufacturers should audit their performance to find the most profitable solutions for daily activities. Just because a repetitive assembly line performs adequately, it doesn't meant there isn't room for improvement.
Automation World said there are three production costs that must be evaluated; direct materials, direct labor and overhead. Data collection devices can help keep track of each of these expenses.
Companies can't become fixed in their ways. Repetitive processes shouldn't be held onto for consistency's sake. Manufacturers have to be ready to abandon previous investments for better solutions.
An RFgen customer case study detailed how a national home products manufacturer wasn't happy with its existing production and inventory management software. The data collection software the company utilized disrupted manufacturing and was prone to outages. RFgen worked with the business to implement a new data collection solution that was more flexible. Even though the company had worked with data collection technology for years, the new solutionintroduced by RFgen provided a completely new insight into daily manufacturing procedures.
For example, the new mobile solutions were used to track material utilized in the production line. Before contacting RFgen, the company was wasting money on materials that were scrapped due to warping or improper cutting. Better tracking measured the performance of each piece of equipment used on materials and prevented damage and waste.
Gaining better visibility of operations allowed the company to change manufacturing, picking, processing and distribution procedures. The overall business became more efficient and profitable.
Companies have to be constantly on the lookout for opportunities to increase profitability. Repetitive assembly lines are great for consistent performance, but a manufacturer can't sacrifice innovation for comfort.
You may unsubscribe from these communications at anytime.